Steve Bain

The Tragedy of the Commons in Economics

The tragedy of the commons is an economic theory that describes a situation in which individuals, acting in their self-interest, deplete a shared resource, ultimately harming the long-term availability of that resource for the entire community.

This phenomenon typically occurs with resources that are non-excludable (individuals cannot be prevented from using them) and rivalrous (one person’s use diminishes the resource available to others).

The concept was popularized by ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968, using the metaphor of a common cattle pasture open to all. In this scenario, each herder seeks to maximize their benefit by grazing as many animals as possible. However, if all herders follow this logic, the pasture will become overgrazed and ultimately unusable, leading to a “tragedy” where everyone loses.

The tragedy of the commons highlights the conflict between individual incentives and collective welfare, illustrating the need for effective management strategies to prevent resource depletion.

Tragedy of the Commons Examples

Case Study 1: Overfishing in the Global Fisheries

Overfishing is a textbook example of the tragedy of the commons. The world’s oceans are a shared resource, and fish populations within them are considered a renewable but limited resource. However, without effective regulation, fishing practices can lead to the over-exploitation of fish stocks, resulting in the depletion or collapse of certain fish populations.

In the fishing industry, each fishing company or individual fisherman has an incentive to catch as many fish as possible to maximize profit. There is no incentive to spare any fish for the purpose of breeding, because the benefits of doing so would likely be captured by another fisherman given the shared access to fishing grounds.

In the case of Atlantic cod, aggressive fishing practices led to the collapse of the cod population off the coast of Newfoundland in the 1990s. This collapse caused widespread economic hardship for local communities dependent on cod fishing and demonstrated how quickly a resource could be depleted when there is no effective control over harvesting.

With modern fishing technology, the efficiency of fish capture has increased significantly, allowing large numbers of fish to be caught quickly. This technological advancement compounds the problem, as it leads to even more over-extraction before natural reproduction can replenish stocks.

Solutions Implemented

To address overfishing, international agreements and fishing quotas have been implemented. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) established exclusive economic zones (EEZs), allowing countries to control fishing practices within 200 nautical miles of their coastlines. Additionally, catch limits and fishing seasons are enforced by various countries to prevent overfishing and encourage sustainable fish populations.

However, illegal fishing and enforcement challenges continue to pose threats to fish populations. Some regions are experimenting with property rights approaches, where individual transferable quotas (ITQs) are assigned to fishermen, giving them a stake in maintaining sustainable fish stocks.

Case Study 2: Overgrazing on Public Lands

In many parts of the world, public lands are used for cattle grazing. For instance, in the western United States, ranchers lease federal lands for grazing livestock. While these lands are regulated, the low cost of leasing often encourages ranchers to overuse the land, leading to a tragedy of the commons scenario. In other countries, such as those in sub-Saharan Africa, overgrazing on communal lands is a significant issue, causing desertification and loss of arable land.

In Niger, for example, common grazing lands have seen severe degradation due to overgrazing by multiple herds of cattle and goats. The area, already prone to drought, has suffered accelerated soil erosion and desertification, diminishing local agricultural productivity and threatening food security.

Solutions Implemented

Some countries have experimented with rotational grazing systems, where land is divided into sections, and animals are rotated between them to allow vegetation recovery. Another approach is community-based management, where local communities collectively manage grazing patterns to prevent overuse.

In the U.S., the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) sets grazing limits and charges fees for grazing permits. However, these fees are often criticized for being too low, which still incentivizes overgrazing. Some environmental groups advocate for higher fees or restrictions on grazing on public lands, though this is controversial due to its economic impact on ranchers.

Modern Applications and Extended Interpretations of the Tragedy of the Commons

Hardin’s use of “commons” initially focused on physical resources, but the concept has evolved to cover a broad spectrum of shared resources, from natural to digital. This broader view has also revealed that Hardin’s analysis was based on some misunderstandings of common property systems; modern research demonstrates that communities can effectively manage shared resources through cooperation, rules, and localized control.

Elinor Ostrom, who pioneered research into community-led governance of common resources, showed that successful management often occurs without government intervention. This includes practices like restricted access and community enforcement, as seen in examples where local fishing communities limit membership or Indigenous groups manage natural resources, such as Canada’s beaver populations.

Negative Commons: Pollution and Shared Environmental Burdens

An interesting extension of Hardin's metaphor is the concept of a “negative commons,” where instead of overusing a shared resource, there is an negative externality cost imposed on all by the irresponsible actions of some. For example, pollution of the air or oceans is a form of a “commons” problem where no individual pays directly for the damage they contribute, but the entire community bears the consequences.

Negative commons can worsen due to the collective incentive to "dump" pollutants, thereby creating over-reliance on a limited capacity to absorb waste.

This is evident in the example of carbon emissions: each car on the road contributes to air pollution and climate change, but the direct cost is not fully borne by the individual. Policies aimed at "internalizing" these externalities, such as carbon taxes or cap-and-trade systems, are modern regulatory responses aimed at curbing the tragedy of negative commons.

Digital Commons and the Tragedy in the Information Age

The concept of the tragedy of the commons has also extended into the digital realm, where resources like bandwidth, storage, and data integrity face similar challenges. Although digital resources like data files are theoretically infinite (as files can be copied), issues arise with accessibility, privacy, and quality maintenance. Platforms like Wikipedia, for instance, rely on the voluntary contributions of users to keep information accurate and updated, which is necessary to prevent the "depletion" of knowledge quality over time.

Another challenge is network congestion; a form of overuse of shared digital infrastructure, such as bandwidth, which can limit access for everyone. Information pollution, in the form of misinformation, spam, or redundant data, also corrupts digital environments, making it harder for users to access valuable information and reducing trust in these resources.

Patents and the Tragedy of Underutilized Technology

In the context of technology, the tragedy of the commons can manifest in intellectual property laws, specifically patents. When patents protect an innovation, it effectively becomes a temporarily private good. However, many patents are left inactive or not commercialized, limiting public access to potentially beneficial technologies.

This creates a situation where resources (valuable innovations) are underutilized, as market conditions may prevent broad application of patented ideas. Proposals to reduce this issue include improving systems to make patented innovations more accessible or supporting open patents in specific sectors to encourage environmentally sustainable technologies.

General Approaches to Mitigate the Tragedy of the Commons

The tragedy of the commons highlights the need for cooperative strategies in managing shared resources. Without such strategies, self-interested actions can lead to unsustainable exploitation, causing long-term harm to both individuals and society as a whole.

The two standard measures to solve the problem are:

  • Privatization: Assigning property rights can give individuals or firms incentives to manage resources sustainably.
  • Government Regulation: Enforcing limits on resource usage, such as quotas, taxes, or seasonal restrictions.

Additional Solutions to the Tragedy of the Commons

Beyond regulatory and privatization-based approaches, alternative solutions to the tragedy of the commons include community-driven management, internalizing externalities, and legal personhood for nature. These solutions focus on enabling local groups to manage resources sustainably, ensuring that resource users bear the full costs of resource exploitation, and protecting ecosystems by granting them legal rights.

Here are some further methods that build upon community participation and institutional innovation:

  • Non-Governmental and Community-Driven Solutions: communities often create their own systems to manage shared resources, particularly when these resources are essential to their livelihood. Elinor Ostrom's research emphasizes that communities with strong social networks, shared values, and effective governance structures are better equipped to manage resources sustainably.
  • Assigning legal personhood to natural entities: This is an emerging solution for the tragedy of the commons. This approach grants ecosystems or natural resources legal rights, enabling them to "sue" for environmental damage. In New Zealand, the Whanganui River was recognized as a legal person, based on traditional Māori beliefs viewing it as a living entity. Legal personhood allows environmental guardians to protect the resource by representing it in legal proceedings, and this approach is gaining traction globally as a way to prevent exploitation and degradation of vulnerable ecosystems.
  • Altruistic Punishment and Social Incentives: Studies show that when people feel angered by free-riders or defectors, they may be willing to "punish" them even if they receive no immediate benefit. Altruistic punishment can bolster community-led conservation efforts, reinforcing social norms and dissuading unsustainable behaviors, as long as the punitive measures are substantial enough to deter free-riding effectively.

Sources:


Related Pages:

Show / Hide